Black eye photo

Short and simple: The girl does not exist. It is a photomanipulation.

The eyes, the nose,  the mouth and even the hair are part of a morphed collage.

IT WAS CHANGED BASED ON BUGGIRL’S COMPLAINTS REGARDING THE PREVIOUS PHOTO WHICH FEATURED A B&W PHOTO OF A GIRL WITH SAD EYES MAKE UP AND NO REAL ABUSE. 

HAPPY NOW BUG GIRL?

YOUR LAME CRY WOLF LIE HAS BACKFIRED AT YOU: YOU MADE IT WORSE.

NOW YOU CAN CRY OUT LOUD AND CRY A RIVER TO A NON EXISTENT GIRL I MADE  & OWN THIS PHOTO, THIS SITE IS PARODY BASED

SO I HAVE A FEW WORDS OF ENCOURAGEMENT EXCLUSIVELY FOR YOU BUG GIRL:

Stop complaining, it is parody and a provocation piece, if you cannot deal with it then get very very angry because it is gonna stay for good.

FOR THOSE WONDERING

This dumb dumb dumb entomologist with a phd

Complained about this stockphoto of a child wearing make up

By throwing these “ad Hitlerum+ child abuser” cheapshots

The real reason for Bug Girls’s simulated outrage is that she is on Rebecca Watson’s side  

Apparently her cry wolf lies inspired a certain someone to send a fake take down for the picture

I finally decided to humor her outrage equally with this photomanipulation

Keep faking outrage BUGGIRL it truly backfired on you.

Now I have a photo that is truly outrageous and I fully own : All because of you. 

Still You don’t like it? go to the feedback page

More details for those with that kind of itch (possibly regulars of gawker.com)

What did she do? well, “Bug Girl”: Cried wolf and lied for personal gain/satisfaction.

Here is the short story in its infograph glory: 

Here is the detailed story: Bug girl likes to lie. Since she did not like her parody she started asking for the original landing page picture to be removed BUT she did so with her signature toddler diva drama: ” OH YOU CRIMINAL! YOU DO NOT CARE ABOUT CHILDREN! ABUSER! SHAME ON YOU” Her real motive: She is one of  many that follow Rebecca Watson. Apparently Buggirl Thought that by lying I was gonna take down the original stock photo of A NON ABUSED CHILD WEARING MAKE UP. (But she kept insisting and playing victim and insisting and insisting) LOGICALLY, Buggirl has minions and one of them joined her parade, here is the blue prince trying to save “princess roach”: his name is Jonathan Wojcik writer for the often mysogynistic parody site cracked.com and manages the site http://www.bogleech.com/comments/feedback.htm ******************************************************************************************************

Jonathan Wojcik Says: September 12, 2011 at 10:18 pm Anyway, newsflash for dysfunctionalwhatever: Google image search is not a stock photo resource. All an image search engine does is look through websites of every sort for images relevant to your keywords. They are still subject to individual copyright policies and have individual owners. I very easily found the same photograph you were using, and it is copyrighted. If you didn’t ask permission to use it, the owners could take legal action against you. You make yourself look rather foolish calling other people “stupid” when their statements to you were not only correct, but common knowledge. Everyone knows that images you find in a search engine aren’t free for use. You can get yourself sued if you don’t adhere to whatever license they’re filed under. I don’t make the laws, I’m just telling you a useful fact. Also, child abuse is a completely rational, universal thing for any human being to be offended by. It makes perfect sense for someone to be disturbed by it whether they are religious or purely scientific, as it is an observable and substantial phenomenon with a long term negative impact on organisms (children) whose existence can, last I checked, is agreed upon by the entirety of the human race. Nobody is being hypocritical or “religious” by taking offense at your trivial treatment of the subject. Your opinions aren’t important enough to warrant a comparison to child abuse. You think it’s a clever and eye-catching way to make a point, but it comes across as cheap and trite, in turn making your entire point look like a joke. I’d have explained all this to you on your own blog, but it looks like you disabled comments, possibly in fear of further criticism. ***************************************************************************************************** Finally, the straw that broke the camel’s back happened & I got a letter from a not very bright person, with a FAKE take down notice, problem is I know where I got the picture but the take down had a completely different reference about the real site of origin. Plus if you call the listed attorneys office and all you get is a gay hotline (that is not a joke) What can you conclude besides it was all just lies to humor an idol in a tremendously lame attempt to appeal a community? a purpose? a need? Really are we Skeptics supposed to lie for personal gain? LAST TIME I CHECKED IT WAS THE THEISTS NOT US. IF IT WAS YOU YOU ARE NOT DUMB YOU ARE LAME AND STUPID So if BugGirl was really that interested in giving all that attention I could only just correspond all her unrequited “RAGE!” So what was the best thing to do? EASY! give her something she can be outraged by and choke on: She was complaining about a completely innocent picture. Well now she has a gory picture equal to what she was complaining about: I just wanted her to know I wanted to match her fiction with Photoshop love Because now you are crowd sourcing this blog into something is gonna get more views. Is that what you wanted? You did want me to do the opposite last time I checked. You girl-lady-ms-nymph whatever you are I know you are dumb… Dumb just dumb… BRAIN DEAD BUG GIRL DUMB….that is. BTW: If any of you want to send more take downs make sure you do go after EACH user of these two sites do as much parody as this blog plus they do monetize I do not: http://www.worth1000.com/ http://www.cracked.com/

For those who missed it the first time, here is the infograph of a bugs’ lame attempts at cheap lying, enjoy the parody moth girl: Do you still find the image of the fake girl offensive and want to express your opinion/comments please click here to go to the complaints page